Eclipse vs Peec AI vs Otterly.AI (2026)

Four engines included on every plan, daily tracking and unlimited users. It's the lowest entry price here by a wide margin, as long as ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot are enough.

Clean daily reporting with every allowance stated in writing, including the number of AI answers you get each month. Pick three models; pay for each one after that.

Tracks ten AI assistants on demand or on a schedule, then turns the gaps into researched, cited, approved articles published straight to your CMS. The only tool here that fixes what it finds.

If all you need is to find out whether ChatGPT knows your brand exists, nothing here comes close to Otterly on price. The bill only gets interesting when you want Claude too.

Every Otterly plan includes four engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot. That's a genuinely useful default set, because AI Overviews and Copilot are exactly the surfaces some rivals leave out. Tracking runs daily, team members are unlimited, and Lite at $29 a month gets you 15 prompts in one workspace with three recommendations a week. Standard at $189 adds unlimited workspaces, unlimited recommendations, and API and MCP access.

The pricing turns on the engine add-ons. Gemini and Google AI Mode cost $9, $59 or $149 a month depending on your tier; Claude costs $29, $109 or $439. On Premium, adding Claude takes a $489 plan to $928, and adding Gemini as well brings it to $1,077, above Eclipse's flat £795. The add-on price scales with your prompt allowance, which is fair in principle, but it means the engine you add matters more to your bill than the plan you pick.

Most tools in this category sell you prompts and leave you to work out what you're actually getting. Peec tells you: 4,500 answers a month on Starter, 13,500 on Pro, 31,500 on Advanced.

Peec is a Berlin company founded in 2025 and focused entirely on AI search reporting. Every self-serve plan includes unlimited users and daily tracking, and you choose three models from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Microsoft Copilot and Gemini. Advanced adds multi-country support and Looker Studio. Agencies get a separate set of plans priced by credits, where one prompt checked by one model on one day uses one credit.

The limit that matters is the three-model ceiling. Each model beyond three costs $35, $85 or $165 a month depending on tier, so tracking four assistants on Advanced is $660 rather than $495. Claude isn't among the six standard self-serve models, so if Claude matters to your buyers, expect an Enterprise conversation. And Peec is deliberately report-only: it tells you where you're missing, but writing the page that fixes it is your job.

Comparing Eclipse to Otterly on tracking alone makes Eclipse look absurdly expensive. That's the wrong comparison. The right one is Otterly plus the writers, editors and publishing time needed to act on what it finds.

Eclipse runs your buyer questions across ten assistants, weekly by default or whenever you choose: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Llama, Mistral, Kimi, MiniMax and Grok. It records who gets named and turns each gap into planned work. Then it does the work: research canvas, evidence-backed briefs, cited articles, approvals, and publishing straight to WordPress, HubSpot, Webflow and other CMSs. There's one plan, no seat fees, and agencies run as many isolated client workspaces as they like with no per-client charge. A full MCP server also lets AI agents such as Claude Code or Cursor research, write, publish and read visibility data without anyone opening the interface; reading data is free, and paid actions show a preview for confirmation first.

The limits aren't on the pricing page, so we asked. The plan includes £50 of AI balance a month, which rolls over if unused, with top-ups at £1 for £1 and no markup, plus 20 generation credits for articles and social drafts. Each workspace gets one fully tracked competitor, with extras at £49 a month, along with five focus keywords and five monitored subreddits, all expandable in paid blocks. There are no onboarding or integration fees. Runs are weekly by default, but you can execute any profile on demand or schedule it daily or even hourly, choosing which assistants each run covers; every run draws on the AI balance, which Eclipse says costs pennies per run. Each result shows the full answer, average position, 30-day change, sentiment and best-performing platform, and a prioritised list of what to do next. The trade-offs are real, though: frequent tracking is paid from the balance rather than included in the plan price, Google AI Overviews and Copilot aren't among its ten assistants, and you can't start without a sales call.